🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of respondents applauding your advice on expanding your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the explanation might be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Dozens of women joined a collective professional network test this week after viral posts suggested that switching their gender to "male" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their professional summaries to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" language - adding results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "transform" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Questions Raised

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in the platform's system prioritizes male users who use online business jargon.

Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which posts appear to which members - boosting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how content perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your content appears in search or feed.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who changed her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "a masculine version", described remarkable outcomes.

"The statistics I'm seeing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, began experimenting after observing her audience decrease significantly.

The Method

• First, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she recycled previous content with comparable "assertive" style

The result was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within one week.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my content were more personal - concise and clever, but also warm and relatable," she stated. "Currently, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after seven days, stating "Every day I persisted, and results improved, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Some testers experienced positive results. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "white" described a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with continuing conversations about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly caused female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to informal experiments where identical content by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and distribute content based on various elements, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

Company representative suggested that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the network.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and less controlled."