🔗 Share this article

The number of guaranteed positions for Māori representatives on NZ local authorities is set to be slashed by over 50%, after a controversial legislative amendment that required municipal councils to put the future of hard-earned Māori seats to a popular referendum.

Background Information on Māori Wards

Indigenous electoral districts, which can include one or more councillors depending on local population numbers, were created in 2001 to provide Māori electors the option to vote for a assured Māori representative in municipal and provincial governments. Originally, councils could only establish a Māori ward by initially submitting it to a community referendum in their area. Communities often spent years generating community backing and pushing their local governments to establish Māori wards.

Legislative Shifts and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the former administration permitted local councils to set up a Māori ward without initially mandating them to subject it to a public vote.

But in 2024, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, saying local residents should decide whether to introduce Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The coalition’s law change required councils that had established a ward under Labour’s rules to hold decisive public votes alongside the local body elections, which ended on October 11. Out of 42 local governments participating in the public vote, 17 decided to retain their seats, and 25 to abolish theirs – showing numerous areas opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.

The results provided “a vital step in reinstating community self-determination.”

Critics however have condemned the government’s law change as “racist” and “against Indigenous interests”. After assuming power, the current administration has ushered in extensive reversals to measures designed to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. The government has stated it wants to terminate “race-based” policies, and says it is committed to enhancing results for Māori and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

Outcomes of the public votes were split down city-country divisions – most cities mandated to hold referendums backed Indigenous seats, while rural regions skewed heavily towards removing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had only just come in – they’re only just starting to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

The recent local government elections recorded the smallest electoral participation in 36 years, with under one-third of citizens casting a vote, prompting calls for an overhaul.

This approach had been “a mockery”.

Differential Standards

Councils are able to establish other types of electoral districts – including rural wards – without initially mandating a community ballot. The different conditions placed on Indigenous representation indicated the administration was singling out Māori representation.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This remark referred to the 17 regions that chose to retain their wards.