🔗 Share this article

Picture this: a smiling the Danish striker in a Napoli shirt. Now, place that with a dejected the Slovenian forward sporting United's jersey, appearing like he's missed an open goal. Do not bother finding a real picture of him missing; context is the enemy. Now, include some goal stats in a large, silly font. Remember the emojis. Post the image everywhere.

Will you point out that Højlund's tally features strikes in the Champions League while his counterpart isn't playing in Europe? Certainly not. Nor would you highlight that four of Højlund's goals were scored versus Belarus and Greece, or that his national team is much stronger to Slovenia and generates far more chances. If you manage online for a large outlet, raw engagement is your livelihood, United are the prime target, and nuance is your sworn enemy.

Thus the wheel of online material spins. Your next task is to sift through a lengthy interview with the legendary goalkeeper and find the part where he calls the signing of Sesko "weird". There's a bit, where Schmeichel qualifies his comments by saying, "Nothing negative to say about Benjamin Sesko"... well, cut that. No one wants that. Simply ensure "weird" and "the player" are paired in the title. People will be furious.

This Time of Potential and Hasty Opinions

Mid-autumn has long been one of my preferred periods to observe football. Leaves fall, winds shift, the teams and tactics are still fresh, everything is new and yet patterns are emerging. Key players of the season ahead are planting their flags. The summer market is closed. Nobody is talking about the quadruple yet. All teams are in contention. Right now, anything is possible.

However, for similar reasons, this period has long been one of my most disliked times to read about football. For while no outcomes are decided, opinions must be formed immediately. Jack Grealish is resurgent. The German talent has been a major letdown. Could Semenyo be the top performer in the league at this moment? We need a decision now.

Sesko as Patient Zero

And for numerous reasons, Sesko feels like Patient Zero in this respect, a player inextricably trapped between football's opposing, unavoidable forces. The need to withhold definitive judgment, allowing layers of technical texture and tactical sophistication to develop. And the demand to generate instant verdicts, a constant stream of takes and memes, out-of-context criticisms and meaningless comparisons, a puzzle that can never truly be circled.

It is not my aim to provide a in-depth evaluation of Sesko's time at United so far. The guy has been in the lineup four times in the Premier League in a highly unpredictable team, scored two goals, and taken a mere of 116 contacts with the ball. What exactly are we analysing? Nor do I propose to duplicate Gary Neville's and Ian Wright's seminal masterwork "The Sesko Debate", in which two famous analysts duel thrillingly on a podcast over whether Sesko needs ten strikes to be a success this year (Neville), or whether it is more like twelve or thirteen (the other).

A Harsh Reality

For all this I loved watching him at Leipzig: a powerful, screeching racing car of a striker, playing in a team ideally suited to his talents: afforded the freedom to rampage but also the freedom to miss. Partly this is why United feels like the cruellest place he could possibly be right now: a place where "harsh judgments" are handed down in about the time it takes to watch a short advertisement, the club with the largest and most pitiless gulf between the patience and space he needs, and the time and air he is likely to receive.

There was a case of this over the national team pause, when a widely shared chart handily informed us that the player had been deemed – by a wide margin – the poorest acquisition of the summer transfer window by a poll of football representatives. Naturally, the press are not alone in such behavior. Team social media, influencers, unidentified profiles with a oddly high number of fake followers: everybody with a vested interest is now essentially operating along the identical rules, an ecosystem explicitly geared for provocation.

The Mental Cost

Scroll, scroll, tap, scroll. What are we doing to us? Do we realize, on some level, what this endless stream of aggravation is doing to our minds? Separate from the inherent strangeness of playing in the center of it all, knowing on some surreal butterfly-effect level that every single thing about them is now essentially content, commodity, open-source property to be repackaged and traded.

And yes, partly this is because United are United, the entity that continues to feed the cycle, a big club that must constantly be producing the strong emotions. But also, partly this is a seasonal affliction, a pendulum of judgment most visibly and harshly glimpsed at this time of year, about a month after the transfer market shut. All summer long we have been desiring footballers, praising them, drooling over them. Yet, just a few weeks in, a lot of those same players are already being dismissed as broken goods. Should we start to be concerned about a new signing? Was Arsenal's purchase of their striker necessary? What was the point of another expensive buy?

The Bigger Picture

It seems fitting that Sesko meets their rivals on the weekend: a team simultaneously on a long unbeaten run at home in the league and yet in their own state of feverish crisis, like filing a a report on a person who went to the store 30 minutes ago. Defensively suspect. Their star past his prime. Alexander Isak waste of money. The coach bald.

Perhaps we have not yet quite grasped the way the narrative of football has started to replace football itself, to influence the way we view it, an entire sport reoriented around talking points and immediate responses, something that happens in the background while we scroll through our devices, incapable to detach from the saline drip of takes and further hot takes. Perhaps this player taking the hit right now. However, everyone is sacrificing a part of the experience here.